Comment #2

From Katelyn’s blog post#1 here is my comment: 

This is a thoughtful response, Katelyn! Your explanation of the challenges you faced with understanding confirmation bias is very clear and relatable. It’s interesting how rewatching and rereading helped you connect the concept to student engagement, showing how misconceptions can prompt deeper critical thinking. Your reflection highlights the importance of looking beyond surface-level understanding and diving into the underlying processes that influence learning.

Your approach to instruction also aligns well with a cognitivist mindset, as you emphasize mental processing and actively building on students’ prior knowledge. The “pair and share” activity is a great example of encouraging learners to engage with the material collaboratively, fostering both comprehension and meaningful participation. The way you balance prompts with group discussions shows your consideration for diverse learning styles, while also incorporating elements of constructivism through active, hands-on learning.

Your insights bring to mind the broader question of how educators can design activities that not only engage students but also challenge them to think critically about their misconceptions. How might these approaches vary across different age groups or subject areas? It’s fascinating to reflect on how these strategies can be adapted to meet the needs of diverse learners and contexts. Well done!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *